and then there were 2
if you are like me, you woke up this morning and you just needed to know, how many former bruins are left in the playoffs? anyone? bueller? bueller? its ok i had to look too. yup that's right sammy, we hardly new you, phalson and sean odonnell, both quacking it up in anahaim.
does it mean anything... well it means a lot to me, as there will now not be the pain of seeing some player i once loved - and i mean that in the pure sports sense - not that there is anything wrong with that, hoisting the cup and rubbing it in our faces that they are gone, or worse ray bourqueing us with the, i wish i could have done it there (or is that here).....
so go ducks!
does it mean anything... well it means a lot to me, as there will now not be the pain of seeing some player i once loved - and i mean that in the pure sports sense - not that there is anything wrong with that, hoisting the cup and rubbing it in our faces that they are gone, or worse ray bourqueing us with the, i wish i could have done it there (or is that here).....
so go ducks!
posted by neb at Thursday, May 10, 2007
![[Valid Atom 1.0]](http://validator.w3.org/feed/images/valid-atom.png "Validate my Atom 1.0 feed")
1 Comments:
I was thinking about these two myself. I think this says something rather profound about what matters most to being successful in Hockey.
I mean, these two guys were hardly on the radar in Boston. And now they are both contributing to what may turn out to be a cup winning effort.
We can blame the GM for letting them go. We can blame the scouts for not seeing their potential. We can blame the hockey gods.
Or maybe, just maybe, this is a sign that a winning team is about more than just the talent of individual players. And if that's so, how do we buy this magic on the free agent market? The answer, of course, is that we can't...
Damn.
Post a Comment
<< Home